To display this page you need a browser with JavaScript support.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

 

 

Click here to return to the Johnstone's View Index

Johnstone's View 23rd November 2007

Since the election in May and the change of government it brought, you could be forgiven for thinking that the sense of urgency has gone out of the Scottish Parliament.  Let me tell you that in my experience, that couldn't be further from the truth.  My day to day responsibilities in the Scottish Parliament cover transport, infrastructure and climate change, working in close partnership with my colleague Derek Brownlee who is responsible for finance and enterprise - which made last week one of the busiest to date.

 

The transport committee, which meets on Tuesdays, has been one of the hardest working committees this session and hasn't missed a weekly meeting yet, devoting most of its time so far to the first piece of legislation promoted by the new government, the Abolition of Bridge Tolls (Scotland) Bill. With a 200 page committee report published the week before, last weeks meeting started the new and even more rigorous process of scrutinising the budget.

 

It’s the job of committees to look closely at the governments spending proposals in their area of responsibility and report to the finance committee on a strict deadline. The report of the finance committee will be debated in parliament before Christmas, with the final stages of the Budget Bill being completed in January and February next year. I expect long meetings every Tuesday till this process is complete.

 

Wednesday’s business was a statement by finance minister John Swinney, on the strategic spending review followed by a debate on the contents of his statement.  This is essentially the start of the budget process and my job was to close the debate for the Conservatives. 

 

Needless to say Mr Swinneys initial proposals fell well short of most members expectations as he failed to deliver on police numbers, funding for drug and alcohol rehabilitation and provision for affordable housing as well as dragging his feet on reducing the tax burden on small businesses and promoting energy efficiency.

 

Proposals for local government funding also leave more questions to be answered with a promise of a council tax freeze but demands for increased efficiency savings and limited extra funding. With, thanks to the previous government, Aberdeenshire already among the least adequately funded councils in Scotland, there is little left to cut but staff. I hope this can be avoided.

 

Closing the debate for the Conservatives I made it quite clear that, "To avoid confusion, I make it clear that neither I nor my Conservative colleagues will vote for the budget proposals that have been set out today," but in closing I also stated that the government had, "not brought forward proposals that will find support in parliament, but that they still have time to do so.”

 

On Thursday, the stage one report on the Abolition of Bridge Tolls (Scotland) Bill was laid before parliament for debate on a motion that the general principals be approved. I opened the debate for the Conservatives supporting the motion unreservedly.

 

The idea that tolls should be used to fund infrastructure projects is a sound one. We may yet have to return to it in the future, but the tolls on the Forth and Tay bridges had done their job long ago.  With the tolls on the Skye and Erskine bridges removed by the previous government, their continuation, exclusively for people who wished to travel to, or through Fife, was simply an injustice.

 

Worse still, all those who came to the committee to argue for their retention did so because they believed they might cut congestion and pollution in Edinburgh.  Thanks to section 3 of the Transport (Scotland) Act 2001, which I voted against incidentally, the city of Edinburgh already has such powers if it had the courage to use them.  Needless to say it does not.  The Conservatives will move an amendment at stage 2 to prevent this act being used to reimpose tolls on the Forth or Tay Bridges in the future. 

 

While the City of Edinburgh Council seem content to see ‘their’ bridge as ‘their’ concern, its impact on the Scottish economy stretches well beyond Fife and the Lothians. Businesses and individuals right into the North East are dependent on it being there. While there may be an element of ‘tokenism’ in this legislation, it is the start of a process, which will see our roads infrastructure, once again, at the top of the government priority list.

 

I hope this change in attitude will now lead on to an early completion of the Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route and a commitment to a replacement Forth crossing if the existing bridge has to be closed to HGV’s in seven years time.

 

Any budget I support in years to come will demonstrate these shared priorities.

 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

www.conservatives.com

Published & promoted by S Lamond on behalf of A Johnstone, both of 8 Robert Street, Stonehaven, AB39 2DN